The concrete factual core is narrower than the headlineâs broad accusation: DOJ told the court it relied on ICEâs incorrect representation that a May 27, 2025 ICE guidance covered EOIR immigration courts, and DOJ now says it does not.
The filing, as described, also points to âagency attorney error,â which may reflect negligence, miscommunication, or something moreâyet the article does not establish (from the quoted record) who knowingly made false statements, which specific filings were wrong, or how many arrests were directly predicated on that misapplied guidance.
What is clearly significantâand verifiable from the described court postureâis that a judgeâs prior reasoning may have rested on an inapplicable policy, forcing re-briefing and potentially altering the legal assessment of courthouse arrest practices.