Featured

Trump: Iran asked me to be Supreme Leader, but I said no thanks

Trump’s “Iran asked me to be Supreme Leader” joke at an NRCC fundraiser uses a real, deadly leadership crisis in Iran to normalize assassination-as-policy and blur what’s confirmed about the war and succession.

Mar 26, 2026

Featured

‘Men need to be perp-walked’ after Epstein files release, Massie tells BBC

A GOP lawmaker says the Epstein document releases are still falling short—because redactions and withheld material may be blocking accountability and survivor-centered justice.

Mar 25, 2026

Buried.News

The stories buried under the noise

Primary focus

Trump fires Kristi Noem as Homeland Security Secretary

A Cabinet secretary was forced out amid contracting and oversight scrutiny, signaling that executive control—not transparent accountability—can dictate leadership of the agency driving mass detention and deportation.

Mar 5, 2026

Featured

The Trump gold coin is not normal : Consider This from NPR

A federal design panel OK’d a Trump portrait for a commemorative gold coin, but the key question is whether Treasury can legally bypass long-standing limits meant to keep living politicians off U.S. money.

Mar 23, 2026

Featured

White House Confronted Over Huge Bets Made Minutes Before Trump’s Big War Move

A $580 million burst of oil-futures selling minutes before Trump’s Iran “talks” post raises a basic public-interest question: did anyone trade on advance knowledge of a market-moving national security decision?

Mar 24, 2026

Norms Impact

High IQ men tend to be less conservative than their average peers, study finds

When IQ research becomes a proxy for ideological legitimacy, a small self-report gap—confined to men and one dimension—can be weaponized to harden social sorting without democratic consent.

General

Feb 18, 2026

Sources

https://www.psypost.org/high-iq-men-tend-to-be-less-conservative-than-their-average-peers-study-finds/

Summary

A longitudinal German study following children identified as gifted in 1987–1988 found that, by their early 40s, gifted and non-gifted adults reported broadly similar political orientations, with an exception among men on conservatism. The institutional shift is the continued elevation of IQ-based cohort research as an authority for interpreting ideology, with self-report surveys standing in for civic behavior. The practical consequence is that a narrow, sex-specific difference risks being treated as a political sorting tool despite small samples and context limits explicitly noted by the researchers.

Reality Check

Turning a narrow, context-bound survey finding into a broad political sorting story invites a dangerous precedent: treating measurable traits as a civic credential, which corrodes equal citizenship and fuels discrimination by implication rather than evidence. Nothing described here is likely criminal on its face, but the governance risk is normative—misuse of “giftedness” research to rationalize exclusion or stigma violates our basic commitments to political equality and individual autonomy. The facts provided also cabin the claim: a small German sample, self-reported ideology, and explicit warnings that terms and effects may not translate to the United States. If we ignore those constraints, we invite institutions and employers to infer character and loyalty from IQ labels, undermining the democratic norm that rights and legitimacy do not depend on cognitive ranking.

Detail

Researchers used data from the Marburg Giftedness Project, a longitudinal study in Germany that began in the 1987–1988 school year with more than 7,000 third-grade students who took standardized intelligence tests measuring reasoning and processing speed. Students with IQ scores of 130 or higher were classified as gifted, and a control group with IQ scores near 100 was selected to match the gifted group on factors including gender ratios and socioeconomic background. Participants were retested six years later in ninth grade to confirm cognitive status.

Roughly 35 years after the initial identification, participants with an average age of about 43 completed surveys measuring political orientation. A total of 87 gifted adults and 71 non-gifted adults responded. Political views were measured using a left–right self-placement scale (1 to 10) and the Political Ideologies Questionnaire assessing economic libertarianism, conservatism, socialism, and liberalism. Using ANOVA and supplementary Bayesian analyses, researchers found no group differences on the left–right scale and no differences on economic libertarianism, socialism, or liberalism. An interaction effect indicated non-gifted men scored higher on conservatism than gifted men; no comparable difference appeared among women.