Discovery filed in federal litigation by the American Council of Learned Societies and the American Historical Association describes a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) review process for National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) grants that used ChatGPT to screen grant descriptions for possible links to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).
In deposition testimony cited in the filings, DOGE staffer Justin Fox said employees prompted ChatGPT to assess whether grant descriptions related to DEI and recorded the responses and explanations in a spreadsheet used to guide cancellations.
The filings describe the spreadsheet as displacing an earlier list compiled by NEH staff of grants targeted for cuts.
One entry involved an NEH award of about $349,000 to the High Point Museum in North Carolina to replace or upgrade HVAC/climate-control equipment used to preserve collections; ChatGPT classified the project as DEI-related because preservation would support broader access to diverse audiences, and the grant was later terminated.
The museumâs director stated work had begun before termination and that the museum recovered roughly 70% of the award under a termination clause.
The filings also cite other flagged grants, including a North Carolina Central University proposal for teaching materials using digital archival collections, which ChatGPT also classified as DEI-related.