Normalizing covert or semi-covert proxy warfare to âjump-startâ regime change shifts decisive national-security power further into the executive branch, where oversight is thinner and public consent is absent. When top officials discuss arming forces while others publicly distance themselves, we lose a coherent chain of accountability and invite mission creep under a fog of ambiguity. Using third-country territory as a launch platform, despite that governmentâs stated refusal, conditions our institutions to treat sovereignty constraints as optional when they conflict with U.S. objectives. Over time, that precedent corrodes separation-of-powers expectations and makes undeclared, open-ended conflict a routine instrument of governance.