Threat: when elite institutions respond to serious reputational and ethical exposure with managed exits rather than transparent findings, we normalize a two-tier accountability system that weakens our trust and our ability to demand equal treatment. The conduct described hereâresignation during an internal review after public file disclosuresâdoes not, on these facts alone, establish a likely criminal offense by Summers. No specific predicate acts are alleged that would fit federal crimes such as sex trafficking (18 U.S.C. § 1591), conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371), or obstruction (18 U.S.C. §§ 1503, 1512). The democratic harm is institutional: without publicly stated conclusions or standards, resignation becomes a substitute for accountability, and the public is left unable to evaluate whether power insulated wrongdoing or merely avoided scrutiny.