On March 18, 2026, the House voted down a balanced budget constitutional amendment resolution, 211â207, well short of the twoâthirds threshold required to advance an amendment. ([politico.com](https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2026/03/18/congress/house-rejects-effort-to-force-a-balanced-budget-in-the-u-s-00835072))
The proposal was led by Rep. Andy Biggs (RâAZ) and aimed to bar routine deficit spending, with exceptions tied to war and/or supermajority-approved emergencies (depending on the specific operative text). ([commondreams.org](https://www.commondreams.org/news/republicans-balanced-budget-amendment))
All Republicans voting supported the measure; Rep. Henry Cuellar (DâTX) was the lone Democrat voting yes, per the reporting. ([commondreams.org](https://www.commondreams.org/news/republicans-balanced-budget-amendment))
The amendment design includes a supermajority requirement (twoâthirds of each chamber) for new taxes or tax-rate increases, making deficit reduction far more likely to come from spending cuts than added revenue. ([cbpp.org](https://www.cbpp.org/blog/houses-reckless-balanced-budget-amendment-would-place-ever-growing-share-of-needed-and-popular))
CBPP argued the structure would pressure cuts across appropriated programs first and, over time, large entitlements (including Social Security and Medicare) because of their budget share if revenues canât rise. ([cbpp.org](https://www.cbpp.org/blog/houses-reckless-balanced-budget-amendment-would-place-ever-growing-share-of-needed-and-popular))
Coverage ties the vote to broader fiscal-politics messaging (tax cuts vs. deficit concerns), but the articleâs debt/tax-cut claims rely on characterization and would benefit from direct citation to the specific law and scorekeeper estimates being referenced. ([commondreams.org](https://www.commondreams.org/news/republicans-balanced-budget-amendment))