Fortune reports that court filings in a federal lawsuit describe DOGE staffers Justin Fox and Nate Cavanaugh using ChatGPT to classify NEH grant proposals as DEI-related, based on a standardized prompt and short responses.
The plaintiffs include the Modern Language Association (MLA), American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS), and American Historical Association (AHA), arguing the grant terminations violated constitutional protections (including First Amendment and equal protection theories). ([mla.org](https://www.mla.org/Resources/Advocacy/Joint-Lawsuit-over-Dismantling-of-National-Endowment-for-the-Humanities))
The filings described by Fortune include a spreadsheet of ChatGPT prompts and responses used to flag grants for cancellation, with many proposals screened and a large share flagged as DEI-related.
One canceled award described in the spreadsheet was for the High Point Museum (North Carolina) to replace an aging HVAC system to improve preservation conditions and access; ChatGPTâs response reportedly labeled it â#DEIâ because better preservation could increase access for âdiverse audiences.â
High Point Museum director Edith Brady told Fortune the museum started the project but it was later terminated, and the museum recovered about 70% of the original award under a termination clause.
Fortune reports an NEH acting chair email in the court record suggesting DOGEâs rationale went beyond DEI to deficit reduction, and that DOGE staff indicated it was their decision whether to discontinue projects.
Fortune reports that DOGE was created as a special advisory effort, that Elon Musk served as its de-facto leader for a limited stint, and that OPM director Scott Kupor later said DOGE ceased to exist as a centralized entity. ([defenseone.com](https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2025/11/doge-no-longer-has-centralized-leadership-under-white-house-tech-team-personnel-head-says/409767/))
The White House did not respond to Fortuneâs request for comment, per the article text provided by the user.