Featured

Trump: Iran asked me to be Supreme Leader, but I said no thanks

Trump’s “Iran asked me to be Supreme Leader” joke at an NRCC fundraiser uses a real, deadly leadership crisis in Iran to normalize assassination-as-policy and blur what’s confirmed about the war and succession.

Mar 26, 2026

Featured

‘Men need to be perp-walked’ after Epstein files release, Massie tells BBC

A GOP lawmaker says the Epstein document releases are still falling short—because redactions and withheld material may be blocking accountability and survivor-centered justice.

Mar 25, 2026

Buried.News

The stories buried under the noise

Primary focus

Trump fires Kristi Noem as Homeland Security Secretary

A Cabinet secretary was forced out amid contracting and oversight scrutiny, signaling that executive control—not transparent accountability—can dictate leadership of the agency driving mass detention and deportation.

Mar 5, 2026

Featured

The Trump gold coin is not normal : Consider This from NPR

A federal design panel OK’d a Trump portrait for a commemorative gold coin, but the key question is whether Treasury can legally bypass long-standing limits meant to keep living politicians off U.S. money.

Mar 23, 2026

Featured

White House Confronted Over Huge Bets Made Minutes Before Trump’s Big War Move

A $580 million burst of oil-futures selling minutes before Trump’s Iran “talks” post raises a basic public-interest question: did anyone trade on advance knowledge of a market-moving national security decision?

Mar 24, 2026

Norms Impact

‘Oh Come on,’ Says Senate Democrat After Jake Tapper Plays Voting-Against-the-Troops Card | Common Dreams

A president wages costly hostilities while preparing a massive funding ask, testing whether Congress will normalize war-by-spending without clear democratic consent.

Congress

Mar 8, 2026

Sources

https://www.commondreams.org/news/support-the-troops-iran-war

Summary

Sen. Chris Murphy publicly rejected CNN anchor Jake Tapper’s framing that voting against President Donald Trump’s expected $50 billion Iran-war funding request would mean “voting against the troops.” The exchange reflects a renewed struggle over Congress’s war-funding role as the president continues military operations while seeking additional appropriations. The practical consequence is a high-stakes vote that will determine whether Congress finances expanded hostilities that multiple senators describe as an illegal war of choice.

Reality Check

The democratic danger is the normalization of sustained military action that proceeds first and seeks large-scale funding later, conditioning our system to treat war as a budget line rather than a constitutional choice. When war costs escalate toward $1 billion per day while Congress debates whether opposing funds is “against the troops,” our civilian oversight is reshaped by coercive framing instead of accountable authorization. This precedent weakens separation-of-powers guardrails by shifting the center of gravity from public deliberation to executive momentum. If Congress cannot assert its role over war funding without being rhetorically branded as disloyal, future presidents will learn that initiating hostilities is easier than ending them—and that democratic consent can be manufactured after the fact.

Media

View media post

Detail

On Sunday, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) pushed back after CNN anchor Jake Tapper said a vote against an expected $50 billion funding request by President Donald Trump for his attack on Iran would be seen as “voting against the troops.” Murphy responded that the public does not want another long-term Middle East war and argued that supporting troops means voting against war funding to keep service members out of harm’s way.

Trump has not yet submitted a formal request for the $50 billion, but estimates cited place the cost of military operations so far at roughly $1 billion per day, with one week of fighting estimated at about $1 billion per day. Murphy said he is a “hell no” on any additional funding, and other Democratic senators echoed opposition. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said Trump is already spending $1 billion per day on what he called an “illegal regime change war of choice” and will seek up to $50 billion more. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) criticized the spending as increasing costs and contributing to higher gas prices.

Norms Impact

Republicans silent after Trump reportedly slashes funds for Alzheimer’s center

A federally celebrated Alzheimer’s research center was cut and its scientists fired, signaling that public-health infrastructure can be dismantled by political discretion without transparent justification.

Executive

Feb 21, 2025

Sources

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-doge-cuts-tom-cole-alzheimers-research-rcna193200

Summary

The Trump administration reportedly slashed funding at the Roy Blunt Center for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Research at the National Institutes of Health, resulting in layoffs and firings including the incoming director. The move reverses a recently celebrated, bipartisan-facing Republican investment in a named federal research institution tied to a retiring GOP power broker. The practical consequence is an immediate loss of specialized staff and leadership that experts say will set Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s research back substantially.

Reality Check

When a White House can abruptly hollow out a federal medical research hub by firing senior scientists and leadership, we normalize governance by purge rather than by evidence—and that precedent ultimately shrinks our own access to competent, stable public institutions. On these facts alone, the conduct is not clearly criminal: agency staffing and budget decisions are often lawful exercises of executive authority, even when destructive. The deeper breach is institutional—using federal personnel and funding as a political lever without transparent criteria, insulating the decision from accountable oversight and inviting future retaliatory dismantling of any program tied to political opponents or inconvenient public needs.

Detail

The National Institutes of Health dedicated a major Alzheimer’s research program as the Roy Blunt Center for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias Research after former Sen. Roy Blunt announced his retirement in 2021. At the 2022 dedication ceremony, multiple Republican lawmakers emphasized the importance of increased funding for Alzheimer’s and dementia research, including Rep. Tom Cole, who cited a fivefold increase and argued the investment could reduce long-term federal costs.

This week, The New Republic reported that the Trump administration slashed funding for the center. People familiar with the situation told the outlet that about one-tenth of the center’s workers were let go, including the incoming director. Sen. Patty Murray said senior scientists and the center’s acting director were fired by the Trump administration. Cole’s office did not respond to a request for comment about the reported cuts.