Featured

Trump: Iran asked me to be Supreme Leader, but I said no thanks

Trump’s “Iran asked me to be Supreme Leader” joke at an NRCC fundraiser uses a real, deadly leadership crisis in Iran to normalize assassination-as-policy and blur what’s confirmed about the war and succession.

Mar 26, 2026

Featured

‘Men need to be perp-walked’ after Epstein files release, Massie tells BBC

A GOP lawmaker says the Epstein document releases are still falling short—because redactions and withheld material may be blocking accountability and survivor-centered justice.

Mar 25, 2026

Buried.News

The stories buried under the noise

Primary focus

Trump fires Kristi Noem as Homeland Security Secretary

A Cabinet secretary was forced out amid contracting and oversight scrutiny, signaling that executive control—not transparent accountability—can dictate leadership of the agency driving mass detention and deportation.

Mar 5, 2026

Featured

The Trump gold coin is not normal : Consider This from NPR

A federal design panel OK’d a Trump portrait for a commemorative gold coin, but the key question is whether Treasury can legally bypass long-standing limits meant to keep living politicians off U.S. money.

Mar 23, 2026

Featured

White House Confronted Over Huge Bets Made Minutes Before Trump’s Big War Move

A $580 million burst of oil-futures selling minutes before Trump’s Iran “talks” post raises a basic public-interest question: did anyone trade on advance knowledge of a market-moving national security decision?

Mar 24, 2026

Norms Impact

Even After Supreme Court Ruling, Trump Insists He Can Do as He Wishes

A president attacking Supreme Court justices to weaken their authority while quickly retooling the same tariffs turns separation of powers from a limit into a political obstacle.

Judiciary

Feb 20, 2026

Sources

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/20/us/politics/trump-justices-gorsuch-barrett-roberts.html

Summary

President Trump publicly attacked Supreme Court justices after the Court ruled he exceeded his authority in imposing tariffs over the past year. The episode reflects a presidency asserting expansive executive power while seeking to delegitimize judicial limits on that power. In practice, the administration signaled it would re-route the same policy goals through narrower statutory tools rather than accept the Court’s boundary as a lasting constraint.

Reality Check

When a president tries to intimidate the Supreme Court after losing, we normalize a government where legal limits survive only at the pleasure of the executive—and our rights become contingent on who holds power. Nothing here, on its face, clearly fits a federal criminal statute: harsh rhetoric about justices is generally protected, and the conduct described is closer to institutional sabotage than chargeable “threats” absent specific intimidation under laws like 18 U.S.C. § 115. The deeper breach is governance: publicly branding justices as corrupted “foreign” tools while the administration “sometimes defied” court orders signals a willingness to treat judicial review as optional, hollowing out the constitutional check that protects citizens from unilateral rule.

Detail

On Friday, President Trump responded angrily to a Supreme Court decision holding that he had exceeded his authority in imposing an array of tariffs over the last year. He labeled justices who ruled against him “fools and lap dogs,” suggested they were corrupted by unspecified foreign influence, and called them “slimeballs.” He said he was “ashamed” of certain members of the Court and singled out Justices Neil M. Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett—whom he nominated during his first term—calling them “an embarrassment to their families” for siding with the majority.

The administration has consistently criticized and sometimes defied lower-court rulings it opposes. After the Supreme Court ruling, Trump did not indicate he would defy the decision and instead described alternative tariff pathways. He said the administration would use Section 122 to impose an across-the-board 10 percent tariff starting Tuesday, and use Section 301 to open investigations into unfair trade practices that could produce additional tariffs.