The FTC (under then-Chair Lina Khan) brought a deceptive-advertising action alleging Intuit marketed TurboTax as “free” when many users could not actually file for free.
An FTC administrative law judge found the “free” claim false for a large share of taxpayers and the FTC issued a cease-and-desist order with long-running restrictions.
On March 20, 2026, a unanimous Fifth Circuit panel vacated the FTC’s order, holding that adjudicating this kind of deceptive-advertising claim in the FTC’s internal process violates constitutional separation-of-powers principles as applied after *SEC v. Jarkesy*.
The Fifth Circuit did not order the case dismissed; it said the FTC’s enforcement action must proceed in federal court and that remedies/standards could change on remand.
The court emphasized the FTC order’s breadth: a 20-year limit on advertising any Intuit goods or services as “free” unless extensive conditions were met, not limited to TurboTax.
Separate from the FTC case, Intuit settled with all 50 states in May 2022 for $141 million over “free” TurboTax marketing and agreed to stop a specific “free, free, free” campaign.
The FTC’s own case listing describes the matter as an administrative complaint about ads pitching “free” filing that millions of consumers could not use.
The ruling fits a broader post-*Jarkesy* legal push that could constrain other agencies’ penalty/fine systems (the article notes similar stakes in telecom enforcement disputes).