Threatening sweeping tariffs to âmake up territoryâ after signing the underlying deal normalizes governance by sudden economic coercion, weakening predictability that our businesses and rights depend on. Based on this record alone, the conduct is not clearly criminal under federal bribery or extortion statutes like 18 U.S.C. §§ 201 or 875(d), and no concrete quid-pro-quo is described. The deeper breach is institutional: executive orders used to rapidly escalate cross-border penalties as a political fix for a self-authored agreement, shifting trade power toward personal impulse rather than stable, reviewable governance.