Featured

California woman says she was raped by Rep. Eric Swalwell in 2018

A new rape allegation against Rep. Eric Swalwell surfaced as he exits a California governor bid and says he will resign from Congress, but the public record so far is largely a press-conference claim pending any law-enforcement filing or corroboration.

Apr 14, 2026

Featured

Trump turns against ‘unacceptable’ Meloni

Trump publicly breaks with Giorgia Meloni after she criticized his remarks about the pope, turning a once-useful alliance into a political liability with consequences for Italy–U.S. relations.

Apr 14, 2026

Buried.News

The stories buried under the noise

Primary focus

Trump fires Kristi Noem as Homeland Security Secretary

A Cabinet secretary was forced out amid contracting and oversight scrutiny, signaling that executive control—not transparent accountability—can dictate leadership of the agency driving mass detention and deportation.

Mar 5, 2026

Featured

Trump’s Acting A.G. Says He Won’t Release Even One More Epstein File

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche says DOJ has released “everything” in the Epstein files, but lawmakers and prior reporting point to millions of pages still withheld and heavy redactions that keep public accountability out of reach.

Apr 14, 2026

Featured

CNN Data Guru Predicts Major Disaster for Trump After Dems Flip Mar-a-Lago

A Democrat flipping the Florida district that includes Mar-a-Lago is real news, but using it to “predict” a national midterm wave oversells what one low-turnout special election can prove.

Mar 25, 2026

Norms Impact

Senate GOP blocks Dem effort to fund SNAP

Senate Republicans used the unanimous-consent veto to block an emergency SNAP funding push, turning food assistance for 42 million people into leverage in a shutdown standoff.

Congress

Nov 4, 2025

Sources

https://thehill.com/homenews/5587414-senate-gop-blocks-dem-effort-fund-snap/

Summary

Senate Republicans blocked a unanimous-consent effort to advance a non-binding resolution urging the Agriculture Department to fully fund November SNAP benefits after funds dried up during the government shutdown. The Senate’s majority used procedural veto power to reject an immediate, targeted call for executive action and instead forced the issue back into shutdown brinkmanship. The practical consequence is that 42 million recipients face reduced food assistance as only partial funding is available.

Reality Check

Using a shutdown to tolerate—or normalize—partial food assistance for tens of millions sets a precedent where basic needs become bargaining chips, and that weakens our democratic stability and our own security in moments of political stalemate. Blocking a non-binding resolution is not itself likely criminal, but the underlying conduct described—threatening or conditioning government action to extract political concessions—tracks classic abuse-of-office and anti–quid-pro-quo governance red flags. If any official action were tied to an explicit exchange of “reopen the government” votes for distributing benefits, prosecutors would scrutinize federal bribery and extortion frameworks, including 18 U.S.C. § 201 and the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. Even without a chargeable bargain, our institutions take damage when essential benefits are treated as leverage rather than administered on a predictable, nonpartisan basis.

Detail

After government-shutdown disruptions left SNAP funds unavailable over the weekend, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) sought to pass a non-binding Senate resolution by unanimous consent calling on the Department of Agriculture to fully fund November SNAP benefits, described as $8 billion.

Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) objected, which blocked unanimous consent and prevented the resolution from advancing. Barrasso argued that the way to ensure benefits for roughly 42 million recipients is to reopen the government through a “clean continuing resolution,” and he characterized the Democratic resolution as “meaningless.” Barrasso also said Democrats had voted against the spending bill 13 times.

Merkley promoted the effort while displaying a sign reading “Trump is weaponizing food for the sake of MAHA.” The dispute followed the Trump administration’s statement that it would partially fund SNAP using Agriculture Department funds covering $5 billion, resulting in partial benefits.