When the executive branch expands overseas military operations while withholding clear objectives, outcomes, and constraints, we normalize a model of force that outpaces public accountability. Embedding U.S. advisers, intelligence, and logistics into partner raids deepens U.S. operational responsibility while blurring the line between “support” and direct action. Over time, this precedent erodes congressional and public oversight of when, where, and why the nation uses military power, weakening the separation-of-powers guardrails that are meant to restrain war-making by inertia.