The key uncertainty is definitional and operational, not just political: the article simultaneously describes ships “defying” a blockade and quotes Centcom claiming none “bypassed” it. Those statements can both be true if the U.S. is **not** stopping all traffic through the Strait, but is instead attempting **selective interdiction** of vessels linked to Iranian ports (as suggested by Centcom’s own language about “freedom of navigation” for non-Iranian port traffic).
The piece also doesn’t establish the basics readers need to judge success or failure: what the rules of engagement are, what counts as “making it past,” whether the tracked vessels were intercepted/hailed/cleared, and what legal basis the U.S. is claiming for a blockade-like action in international waters. Without those specifics, “humiliated” is more of a vibe than a verifiable conclusion.